Forum Jump :

Author Message

Posts: 356

Level: Member

Country: it
Location: Somewhere
Occupation: Trying to be different from the mass
Age: 22
In-game name: Jack

#102358 Posted at 2011-04-18 15:27        
# DarkXess : Man! I could remember when Red Faction first came out and everyone loved it has it had destructable
environments and to me with what we have seen already, Battlefield3 has not gone over the top as we
have seen in the videos etc, its looks awesome! and I can only see this game being a TOP if not the best
game in years! dont forget that the Battlefield makers have been in this series of games for a few years
now, multiplayer is there speciality and id find it hard to see or say that they will fail with this!

Cant believe alot of the negativity in this thread, and another thing that your all forgetting is that its
not even close to release yet! its got a long way off! just imagine what else and the many more improvements
that will be made! rock on BF3.

OH MY... Have you seen the 12 minutes gameplay???? Basicly it is made of all that gameplays of "Fault Line" linked together without cuts... I can't wait, i really can't fu****************** wait!!!!
This game will rock!!!
And for destruction it will not be like Red Faction Guerrilla (i think that is really good but not too realistic...) but it'll be AWESOME!!!!!
I've played Bad Company 2 and the Frostbite is something really well done and can't wait for Frostbite 2...
Will you play it on pc? Or consoles?
I'd like to play it on my pc but it will kill itself... I mean I have a really good graphics card (ATI Radeon HD 5750) but the CPU is ehm... 2.00 Ghz lol If BATTLEFIELD 3 will require such performances like ArmA II well... I'll take it on console.

Added 14 minutes later:

# Rick : It looks disappointing to me. This, to me, looks like COD 4 with better (but unrealistic) graphics and destruction. I'm only 20 but I think I might have grown out of running and gunning. Besides, even though BF tries to force some level of teamwork, BF players almost never use it. Arma on the other hand is very very good. Most arma players are looking to be a part of some sort of teamwork, regardless of clans etc... I will wait for the in-game youtube videos of the beta at least before I spend money on BF3. I also have a very low opinion of EA. The BFBC2 stats server hasn't been working properly since the release of the vietnam expantion, and not even all the weapons are in the stat page. I can deal with bugs, I can deal with a LOT of bugs; but EA fails to fix things not because they are busy, but because they are too cheap to buy a decent server. EA is a prime example of how not to run a game. And the BF series is not it's only testimony. I came from there to find something where the tempermental kids were not. Yes, thats pretty much the only reason I bought arma; the reviews said "it's slow paced". Although the reviews are wrong in my opinion, (its only as slow as you make it), I found so much more in arma that was missing in BF. Needless to say, I will only buy this game if the youtube videos and reviews say it's "EPIC". Otherwise I'll be having fun in arma where ppl don't cry or feel better because their padded stats.
You might be right with EA and the "cheap" question but remember that EA is the publisher... DICE is the producer/developer with the Frostbite and the second one.

This post was edited by DeltaForce (2011-04-18 15:41, ago)